User talk:Mikeandike

Thank you for experimenting with Wikipedia. Your test worked, and has been reverted or removed. Please use the sandbox for any other tests you want to do. Take a look at the welcome page if you would like to learn more about contributing to our encyclopedia. Tfine80 22:57, 28 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]

If you're going to revert a page (e.g., Stuyvesant High School), please don't put a misleading edit summary (e.g., "inserted NPOV info") on the reversion. That's an easy way to get the page put back as it was, because it's a well-known technique on Wikipedia for trying to avoid scrutiny. Thanks, and as Tfine80 already said, welcome aboard! RossPatterson 23:19, 28 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]

not a problem. Mikeandike 21:55, 6 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]

I don't mean to harp on you, but changing others' comments on your talk page is considered bad form on Wikipedia, especially when it changes the meaning of the comment. I've restored mine and Tfine80's above. Have fun editting! RossPatterson 23:39, 6 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]

if you'd like to check out user talk or discussion removals check out tfine80 's page Mikeandike 17:32, 8 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Whether or not you and Tfine80 are happy with each other has no bearing on editting people's comments on your talk page, even those of Tfine80 (unless he/she posts a comment that violates the rules, like a personal attack). It simply isn't done. See Wikipedia:Vandalism for the full details, but here's the relevant passage:

Removing warnings, whether for vandalism or other forms of 
prohibited/discouraged behavior, from one's talk page is also 
considered vandalism.

RossPatterson 02:44, 9 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]

It is suspected that this user might be a sock puppet or impersonator of Bobbydoop.
Please refer to contributions for evidence. See block log.